CO129-309 - Public Offices & Others - 1901 — Page 254

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

White kir Boulton claims that he should draw his monies as he has in recent years given in despatch.

Drawn for Romano CHAD on 20797.

I see no sufficient reason to increase his salary.

5.4.5.

Express regret that the said cannot meet his wishes.

M. Johnson

Mi

Look at 17633.00

que. J., 15/2

Sir,

to that

B

27708

Ov

It was proposed to give him an additional $600 to make his salary equal to the senior Executive Engineer in the P.W.D.

of the

2

See par: 16 of 20197

to

M. Tarlton's letter on

Is Are you clear that we should not increase the pay? I have some doubt.

Mr. Luces

CPF

IS

It is time that Mr Boulton has hitherto drawn more than M. Mudie quite lately, in fact, but will now only be drawn the same salary; as their service is the same length of time.

Thirdly thought there was reason for increase because the fflant was increasing.

On the whole, Mr. Boulton's salary on recommendation in mine, of the study in the increase, 17633/02, should be given but og from the dabsthis return for mes 21/2.

C.P.L 21

at?

I by leave to

252 C.C.

San Remo. 11th February 1901.

Reverting to the subject of my letter to you, dated the 22nd August, 1900, and your reply No.27708/1900, I enquire whether anything further has been done with regard to that matter.

I have the honour to be, Sir, Your most obedient Servant,

A. G. Boulton.

The Under Secretary of State, Colonial Office. London.

Edit History

2026-06-01 06:14:10 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
White kir Boulton claims that he should draw his monies as he has in recent years given in despatch. Drawn for Romano CHAD on 20797. I see no sufficient reason to increase his salary. 5.4.5. Express regret that the said cannot meet his wishes. M. Johnson Mi Look at 17633.00 que. J., 15/2 Sir, to that B 27708 Ov It was proposed to give him an additional $600 to make his salary equal to the senior Executive Engineer in the P.W.D. of the 2 See par: 16 of 20197 to M. Tarlton's letter on Is Are you clear that we should not increase the pay? I have some doubt. Mr. Luces CPF IS It is time that Mr Boulton has hitherto drawn more than M. Mudie quite lately, in fact, but will now only be drawn the same salary; as their service is the same length of time. Thirdly thought there was reason for increase because the fflant was increasing. On the whole, Mr. Boulton's salary on recommendation in mine, of the study in the increase, 17633/02, should be given but og from the dabsthis return for mes 21/2. C.P.L 21 at? I by leave to 252 C.C. San Remo. 11th February 1901. Reverting to the subject of my letter to you, dated the 22nd August, 1900, and your reply No.27708/1900, I enquire whether anything further has been done with regard to that matter. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your most obedient Servant, A. G. Boulton. The Under Secretary of State, Colonial Office. London.
Baseline (Original)
white kir Boulton claius that be should dirais mon three but ndie as he has in retent years givan in despaticle drawn for romano CHAD on 20797 I see no sufficient reased to increase his salary. 5.4.5. ? Express regret that the s. caust meet his wishes. M. Johnson Mi Look at 17633.00 que. J., 15/2 Sir, to that B 27708 Ov It was proposed to give him an additional $600. to make his salary equali -the senior Executive Engineer in the P.W.D of the 2 See par: 16 of 20197 to M- Tarlton's letter on Is Are you clear that we should not increase the pay? I have some doubt Mr. Luces CPF IS It is time that Me Boulton has hitherto drawn more until than M, Mudie quite lately, in fact, but will now only be drawn the Intand as their service s'ame salary; is the same of time Thirdly thought ther reason for incre buy the ffiant was increasing On the whole, Mh. Boulton's salay. On recommendation in meir, of the study in the increase, 17633/02, Gyould gave but og from the dabsthis retum för mes 21/2 C.P.L 21 at? I by leave to 252 C.C. San Remo. 11th February 1901. Reverting to the subject of letter to you, dated the 22nd August, 1900, and your reply No. 27708 1900, enquire whether any - thing further has been done with regard to that matter, I have the honour to be, Sir. Your most obedient Servant, A. G. Boulton. The Under Secretary of State, Colonial office. London.
2026-06-01 06:14:10 · Baseline
View content

white kir Boulton claius that be should dirais mon three but ndie as he has

in retent

years givan in despaticle

drawn

for romano CHAD

on 20797

I see no

sufficient reased to increase his salary.

5.4.5.

? Express regret that the s. caust meet his wishes.

M. Johnson

Mi

Look at 17633.00

que. J.,

15/2

Sir,

to that

B

27708

Ov

It was proposed to give him an additional $600. to make his salary equali

-the senior Executive Engineer in the P.W.D

of the

2

See par: 16 of

20197

to

M- Tarlton's letter on

Is Are you clear that we should not increase

the pay? I have some doubt

Mr. Luces

CPF

IS

It is time that Me Boulton has

hitherto drawn more

until

than M, Mudie

quite lately, in fact, but will

now only be drawn the

Intand as their service

s'ame salary;

is the same

of time Thirdly thought ther reason for incre

buy the ffiant

was

increasing

On the whole,

Mh. Boulton's salay. On

recommendation

in meir, of the study in the increase,

17633/02, Gyould

gave

but og from the dabsthis retum för

mes 21/2

C.P.L

21

at?

I by leave to

252

C.C.

San Remo.

11th February 1901.

Reverting to the subject of

letter to you, dated the 22nd August,

1900, and

your reply No. 27708 1900,

enquire

whether

any -

thing further has been done with

regard to that matter,

I have the honour to be,

Sir.

Your most obedient Servant,

A. G. Boulton.

The Under Secretary of State,

Colonial office. London.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.